<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<records>


  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    
      <publisher>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher>
    
    <journalTitle>Material Science Research India</journalTitle>
    
      <issn>0973-3469</issn>
    
    
    <publicationDate>2014-08-30</publicationDate>
    

        <volume>11</volume>

        <issue>1</issue>

 

    <startPage>01</startPage>
    <endPage>08</endPage>

   
      <doi></doi>
    
    <publisherRecordId>510</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Comparison of different oxidation techniques for biofunctionalization of pyrolyzed carbon</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>Varun Penmatsa</name>

 
		

	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    


	 


      <author>
       <name>Hiroshi Kawarada</name>


		

	<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>

      </author>
    


	 


      <author>
       <name>Yin Song</name>

		

	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    


	 


      <author>
       <name>Chunlei Wang</name>

		

	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    



	



	

    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		

		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">1Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University. Miami, USA.</affiliationName>
    


		

		<affiliationName affiliationId="2">School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University. Tokyo, Japan.</affiliationName>
    

		

		

		

		

	  </affiliationsList>







    <abstract language="eng"><p>Pyrolyzed carbon micro/nano-structures have great potential as functional units in biosensors where biofunctionalization of the carbon surface is a requisite. In this work, we present a comparison of four different oxidation pretreatments, i.e. vacuum ultraviolet (VUV), electrochemical activation (EA), oxygen reactive ion etching (RIE), and ultraviolet/ozone (UV/O3) pretreatments on pyrolyzed carbon surface. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicated that all the oxidation techniques except UV/O3 pretreatment yielded identical oxidation levels. The percentage of the carboxyl group which is suitable for covalent attachment of amine terminated biomolecules increased with pretreatment time, and was highest in the case of VUV pretreatment (15%) followed by oxygen RIE (12.5%) and EA pretreatments (12.5%) and UV/O3 pretreatment showed significantly lower carboxyl group percentage at 6%. This study helps to optimize the surface functionalization conditions for covalent binding of bioreceptors on the pyrolyzed carbon substrate for biosensing applications.<strong> </strong></p></abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://www.materialsciencejournal.org/vol11no1/comparison-of-different-oxidation-techniques-for-biofunctionalization-of-pyrolyzed-carbon/</fullTextUrl>




      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword>Carbon-MEMS</keyword>
      </keywords>


      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword> pyrolyzed carbon</keyword>
      </keywords>


      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword> functionalization</keyword>
      </keywords>


      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword> vacuum ultraviolet</keyword>
      </keywords>


      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword> electrochemical activation</keyword>
      </keywords>


      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword> oxygen reactive ion etching</keyword>
      </keywords>


      <keywords language="eng">
        <keyword> ultraviolet/ozone</keyword>
      </keywords>

  </record>

</records>