Theoretical Insights into Hydrogen Bonding, IR Spectra, and Reactivity of Pimelic Acid in Mixed Solvents Using DFT Calculations


Sandip B. Nahire

Department of Chemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir’s M.S.G. Arts, Science and Commerce College, SP Pune University, Pune, India

Corresponding Author E-mail:nahiresandip@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/msri/220206

Download this article as:  PDF

ABSTRACT:

This study explores the structural, vibrational, and electronic behavior of pimelic acid (PA) in different solvent environments—pure, binary (PA–water and PA–ethanol), and ternary (PA–water–ethanol)—using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level. Geometry optimization, vibrational frequency analysis, and molecular orbital calculations were performed to examine hydrogen bonding interactions, IR spectral shifts, and global reactivity descriptors. Results show that the –OH bond distance and stretching frequencies are significantly affected by solvation. Stronger hydrogen bonding was observed in the PA–ethanol complex than in PA–water, with the ternary PA–water–ethanol system (PAWE) exhibiting cooperative effects from both solvents. Intermolecular H-bond distances and frequency shifts confirmed the presence and strength of solute–solvent interactions. Frontier molecular orbital (FMO) analysis revealed solvent-induced variations in the HOMO–LUMO gap, indicating changes in reactivity and stability. Global descriptors—electronegativity, chemical hardness, softness, and electrophilicity—further support the influence of solvent polarity on the reactivity profile of PA. These findings provide theoretical insight into solvation effects on PA, contributing to a better understanding of their chemical behavior in mixed solvent systems.

KEYWORDS:

Density Functional Theory; Global reactivity descriptors; Hydrogen bonding; HOMO–LUMO gap; Pimelic acid; Solvent effects

Introduction

Pimelic acid [1,7-heptanedioic acid, (CH₂)₅(COOH)₂; molar mass: 160.17 g mol⁻¹; CAS No. 111-16-0] is a linear aliphatic dicarboxylic acid that serves as a versatile intermediate in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. It is widely used in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, surfactants, flavors, and cosmetic ingredients, primarily due to its role as a precursor for 1,7-heptanediol. Additionally, pimelic acid has been employed in biochemical studies and as a key building block in organic synthesis pathways1-3. Understanding the molecular interactions of such acids in solvent systems is critical for applications involving solubility, reactivity, and formulation development. In this context, Density Functional Theory (DFT) has emerged as a powerful computational technique for probing the structural, electronic, and vibrational characteristics of organic molecules in various environments. Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of DFT—particularly using the B3LYP functional with the 6-311+G(d,p) basis set—in elucidating solute–solvent interactions, hydrogen bonding, vibrational frequency shifts, and global reactivity descriptors4-5. For instance, in our previous study6, we conducted a comprehensive DFT and experimental investigation on glutaric acid in water–ethanol binary mixtures, where we evaluated solubility, intermolecular hydrogen bonding, vibrational spectra, and global chemical reactivity indices. The study demonstrated that solvation significantly influences the O–H stretching frequencies and hydrogen bond distances, with findings supported by correlated thermodynamic data. This methodology was further extended in our subsequent work7 on malonic acid in aqueous alcohol mixtures, where we combined solubility measurements with DFT calculations to derive insights into HOMO–LUMO energies, IR spectral behavior, and thermodynamic functions. These studies collectively highlight the critical role of solvent polarity and hydrogen bonding capacity in modulating the structural and electronic properties of dicarboxylic acids. Complementing these efforts, Hammami and Issaoui explored hydrogen-bonded clusters of pyruvic acid with water using DFT, revealing how micro solvation modulates IR signatures and stabilizes specific conformers through strong hydrogen bonding8. Furthermore, Pushparaju et al.9 applied B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) to study alkoxybenzoic acid-based hydrogen-bonded systems, calculating HOMO–LUMO energy gaps, polarizability, and IR frequencies to characterize their liquid crystalline behavior. Updated DFT and IR analyses of tartaric acid confirmed strong hydrogen-bonding contributions to vibrational band shifts, further validating DFT approaches in carboxylic acids10. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding in ternary liquid crystalline mixtures was recently examined by FTIR spectroscopy, highlighting cooperative hydrogen-bonding effects comparable to our PA–water–ethanol system11. Similar insights were reported for azelaic acid complexes in coordination chemistry, where DFT revealed hydrogen bonding as a key stabilizing factor12.

These studies establish a strong methodological foundation for applying DFT to PA in mixed solvent systems. However, a detailed theoretical investigation of PA in water–ethanol mixtures—focusing on hydrogen bonding dynamics, vibrational shifts, reactivity indices, and IR spectral features—remains underexplored. The present study aims to address this gap by employing DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level to investigate the structural and electronic modifications in pimelic acid resulting from interactions with binary and ternary solvent systems. Although Gaussian 03 is not the most recent version, it was used in the present study to ensure consistency and reproducibility with our earlier related works6-7.

Computational Methodology

A comprehensive computational study was conducted to elucidate the molecular interactions influencing the solution behavior of PA. Geometry optimizations of the isolated molecule, as well as its binary and ternary solvent complexes, were performed using the Gaussian 03 software package13. All density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out on a Windows 10 platform equipped with an Intel Core i7 processor and 16 GB of RAM. The B3LYP functional in combination with the 6-311+G(d,p) basis set was employed to obtain optimized geometries and electronic properties. Vibrational frequencies were computed at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level and scaled by a factor of 0.9679, consistent with standard literature practice for this basis set. Dispersion corrections (Grimme’s D3) were not included, as the primary focus was on hydrogen-bonding-driven interactions, where B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) has been shown to give reliable geometries and vibrational trends in previous studies4-9. The computational analysis was designed to elucidate solvent–solvent and solute–solvent interactions at the molecular level. DFT-based FTIR spectral analysis revealed characteristic shifts in the –OH stretching frequencies, indicative of hydrogen bond formation within binary solvent mixtures and ternary solute–solvent systems. These frequency shifts provide insights into the nature and strength of the intermolecular interactions involved14.

The dipole moment of a molecule, defined as the product of charge separation and the distance between charges, is directly related to molecular polarizability and solubility. Molecules with large ground-state dipole moments exhibit stronger interactions with polar solvents owing to the solvent polarity effects15-18. Furthermore, molecular polarizability and atomic electron density distribution are correlated with frontier molecular orbitals, that is, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), which influence the chemical reactivity and solubility19-21. A recent combined DFT–thermodynamic study on carboxyl-based solvents further emphasized how hydrogen bonding and solvent polarity regulate solute stability and reactivity22.

A key parameter derived from DFT is the HOMO–LUMO energy gap, which provides insight into chemical reactivity and electronic stability:

HOMO – LUMO Energy Gap = Energy of LUMO – Energy of HOMO                              (1)

All orbital energies were expressed in electron volts (eV). If the energy gap is computed in Hartrees (atomic units), it is converted to eV using

Energy gap (eV) = Energy gap (Hartree or a.u.) × 27.21138602                                          (2)

In this work, only explicit solvent clusters (PAW, PAE, and PAWE) were considered, as our aim was to directly probe solute–solvent hydrogen-bonding interactions. No implicit solvation model (PCM/SMD) was applied in combination, in order to isolate and characterize the effects of explicit hydrogen bonds. The PA–water–ethanol (PAWE) complexes were built from binary-optimized minima (PAW and PAE) and fully re-optimized without symmetry constraints to confirm true minima (no imaginary frequencies).

Electrochemical Properties

Frontier molecular orbital (FMO) energies provide insight into the electronic stability and reactivity of molecules. The HOMO energy (EHOMO) reflects the electron-donating ability, while the LUMO energy (ELUMO) indicates electron-accepting potential; their separation defines the HOMO–LUMO gap, a key descriptor of chemical reactivity23-24.

Global reactivity descriptors such as electronegativity (χ), chemical potential (μ), chemical hardness (η), softness (σ), electrophilicity index (ω), ionization potential (I), and electron affinity (A) were obtained from EHOMO and ELUMO using Koopmans’ theorem-based formulations25 and standard treatments described in the literature26. These indices offer quantitative measures of the stability and reactivity profile of pimelic acid in different solvent environments.

Results and Discussion

The optimized geometries of PA and its solvent-associated complexes are illustrated in Fig. 1. The corresponding structural and electronic properties derived from these optimizations are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. It is observed that the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) and nuclear repulsion energy of PA increase upon complexation with both single and binary solvent molecules. Similarly, the absolute total energy, isotropic polarizability, and theoretically computed thermodynamic parameters of PA also exhibit an increasing trend in the presence of solvent interactions. As shown in Table 1, the –O–H bond length of the carboxylic group in isolated PA is greater than that in the PAW and PAE complexes. Among the pure solvent combinations, the bond length follows the order: PAE > PAW. Furthermore, the carboxylic –O–H bond distance in the ternary PA-water-ethanol (PAWE) complex is found to be longer than that in isolated PA, indicating enhanced solute–solvent interactions in the mixed solvent environment.

Table 1 also presents the intermolecular hydrogen bond (H-bond) distances between pimelic acid (PA) and its solvent complexes. The H-bond distances—specifically between a hydrogen atom of the carboxylic group in PA and an oxygen atom of the solvent (-H···O-), as well as between an oxygen atom of the carboxylic group and a hydrogen atom from the solvent (-O···H-)—follow the trend: PAE < PAW. This suggests stronger hydrogen bonding interactions in the PA–ethanol complex compared to the PA–water complex. A similar trend is observed in the ternary PAWE complex, further supporting this conclusion. As the optimized hydrogen bond distances (Table 1) clearly show consistent shortening in the ethanol complexes relative to water, additional statistical analysis or binding energy decomposition was not pursued, since such treatments fall beyond the scope of the present structural–vibrational focus

The results of the theoretical vibrational frequency analysis for PA and its solvent complexes are presented in Table 1 and illustrated graphically in Fig. 3. The –OH stretching frequency of carboxylic acid in pure PA is higher compared to that in PAW and PAE complexes. Among the binary solvent systems, the observed order of increasing –OH stretching frequency is: PAE (3330.73 cm⁻¹) < PAW (3419.28 cm⁻¹), indicating a more pronounced red shift in ethanol. Experimental IR studies of related dicarboxylic acids in hydrogen-bonded environments typically report –OH stretching bands in the range of 3300–3500 cm⁻¹27, 28. The computed values (after applying the 0.9679 scaling factor) fall within this range, confirming that the observed red shifts are consistent with literature expectations. This significant difference suggests that stronger solute–solvent interactions occur in the PAE complex than in the PAW system. Furthermore, the –OH stretching frequency in the ternary complex (PAWE) is lower than that of pure PA, implying the presence of additional intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the PAWE system.

The HOMO and LUMO energies, along with the corresponding HOMO–LUMO energy gap, are presented in Table 3 and illustrated graphically in Fig. 2. Relative to isolated PA (7.71 eV), the HOMO–LUMO gap changes by +7.3% in water, –1.5% in ethanol, and ~ –2% in ternary systems. These quantitative variations support the claim that solvent polarity and hydrogen bonding modulate the electronic stability and reactivity of PA. The values of HOMO–LUMO energy gap were further utilized to compute the global chemical reactivity indices, summarized in Table 4. The electrophilicity index (ω) is higher in ethanol-containing systems (PAE: 2.14 eV; PAWE: 2.12 eV) than in water (PAW: 2.20 eV), indicating greater electron-accepting ability and enhanced susceptibility of PA toward nucleophilic attack at the carboxyl carbon. This agrees with earlier findings that solvation enhances the electrophilic power of neutral molecules, thereby favoring esterification reactivity in ethanol-rich media while water stabilizes PA through stronger hydration29. Parallel DFT studies on adipic acid have revealed solvent-dependent hydrogen bonding as a determinant of reactivity in catalytic environments30. Recent mechanistic studies on aliphatic carboxylic acids also demonstrated that solvent polarity and hydrogen bonding tune reactivity patterns, supporting the trends observed in this work31.

Table 1: Calculated υ-OH (–OH str.freq.), -OH bond distance, intermolecular H-bond distance for pure substance, binary solvents and ternary solution by DFT/ B3LYP method at 6-311G +(d p) basis set

System Carboxylicυ-OH cm-1 Carboxylic (-OH) Bond Dist. (Ǻ) InterMolecular H-Bond Dist.

(Ǻ)

O-H

InterMolecular H-Bond Dist.(Ǻ)

C=O-H

Zero point  vibration energy Kcal/mol Nuclear Repulsion Energy Hartrees
PA 3758.60 0.9691 119.558 582.982
W 3818.57 0.9619 13.3592 9.1571
E 3843.85 0.9617 49.9302 81.6031
WE 3838.35 0.9626 1.9011 65.2986 131.056
PAW 3419.28 0.9863 1.8058 2.0414 135.306 679.349
PAE 3330.73 0.9907 1.7611 2.0173 171.048 850.539
PAWE 3420.973338.82 0.98620.9905 1.80741.7636 1.98702.0292 186.780 956.713

Table 2: Theoretical Computed total energy, isotropic polarizability (α), thermodynamic function calculated by DFT/B3LYP method and 6-311G (+d p) basis set. [PA, solvents and its combinations]

System E (RB3LY)a.u. (α)Bohr3 Total Energy (a.u.)
E (Thermal) Kcal/mo CVcal/mol/K SCal/mol.K
PA -575.0946 97.079 127.401 43.060 115.670
W -76.4584 7.29 45.087 15.139 6.014
E -115.095 30.90 64.711 52.658 13.615
WE -231.563 39.49 23.735 70.142 85.735
PAW -651.569 106.27 144.923 52.240 131.005
PAE -730.206 130.72 182.357 60.564 149.333
PAWE -806.681 139.95 199.858 69.755 162.860

Table 3: HOMO-LUMO energies and energy gap between LUMO-HOMO.

System HOMOev LUMOev LUMO-HOMOenergy gap(eV)
PA -7.9879 -0.2811 7.7068
W -8.7896 -0.5203 8.2693
E -7.6342 -0.0457 7.5884
WE -7.9569 -0.2746 7.6823
PAW -7.9795 -0.2650 7.7144
PAE -7.7909 -0.2449 7.5460
PAWE -7.7855 -0.2191 7.5664

Table 4: Global chemical reactivity indices.

System η eV ϭ eV χ eV μ eV ω eV A eV I eV
PA 3.8534 0.2595 4.1345 -4.1345 2.2180 7.9879 0.2811
W 4.1346 0.2419 4.6549 -4.6549 2.6203 8.7896 0.5203
E 3.7942 0.2636 3.8399 -3.8399 1.9431 7.6342 0.0457
WE 3.8412 0.2603 4.1157 -4.1157 2.2050 7.9569 0.2746
PAW 3.8572 0.2593 4.1223 -4.1223 2.2028 7.9795 0.2650
PAE 3.7730 0.2650 4.0179 -4.0179 2.1393 7.7909 0.2449
PAWE 3.7832 0.2643 4.0023 -4.0023 2.1170 7.7855 0.2191
Figure 1: Optimized geometries of PA and solvent complexes obtained at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level a) PA b) PAW c) PAE d) PAWEClick here to View Figure
Figure 2: HOMO, LUMO structures with LUMO-HOMO energy gap.Click here to View table
Figure 3: Theoretical I.R. spectra in gas phase by DFT/B3LYP at 6-311G (+d p) basis setClick here to View Figure

Conclusion

The DFT analysis of pimelic acid (PA) in pure, binary, and ternary solvent environments demonstrates that solvation significantly modulates its structural, vibrational, and electronic properties. Quantitatively, the HOMO–LUMO gap decreased by 0.16 eV in ethanol (PAE: 7.55 eV) compared to isolated PA (7.71 eV), while water increased the gap by ~7% (8.27 eV). Similarly, hydrogen bond distances were shorter in ethanol (1.76 Å) than in water (1.81 Å), confirming stronger solute–solvent interactions in ethanol-rich media.

These solvent-induced changes are not only of theoretical interest but also carry broader chemical relevance. Modulation of the electrophilicity index (ω) by solvent polarity indicates that ethanol promotes stronger hydrogen bonding and facilitates accessibility of the carboxyl carbon to nucleophiles, consistent with PA’s role in esterification and related reactions. Such insights are useful for industrial formulation and solvent selection, where mixed solvents like water–ethanol can provide a tunable balance between reactivity and stability. From a green chemistry perspective, water–ethanol mixtures represent sustainable media that optimize reactivity while minimizing reliance on harsher solvents.

Acknowledgement

The author is thankful to Principal of MSG Arts, Science and Commerce College Malegaon for providing DFT software. The authors also express their sincere thanks to Dr Apoorva Hiray (Co-ordinator M.G. Vidyamandir Malegaon).

Funding source

“The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.”

Conflict of Interest

“The authors do not have any conflict of interest.”

Data Availability Statement

“This statement does not apply to this article”

Ethics Statement

“This research did not involve human participants, animal subjects, or any material that requires ethical approval.”

Authors’ Contribution

“The sole author was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, data collection, analysis, writing, and final approval of the manuscript”

References

  1. J.C. Espinosa-Lara, D. Guzman-Villanueva, J.I. Arenas-García, D. Herrera-Ruiz, J. Rivera-Islas, P. Román-Bravo, H. Morales-Rojas, H. Höpfl, Cocrystals of active pharmaceutical ingredients Praziquantel in combination with oxalic, malonic, succinic, maleic, fumaric, glutaric, adipic, and pimelic acids. Growth Des. 13, 169–185 (2013).
    CrossRef
  2. J. Cason, L. Wallcave, C.N. Whiteside, A convenient preparation of suberic acid. Concerning the homogeneity and use in synthesis of polymethylene chlorobromide preparations. Org. Chem. 14, 37–44 (1949).
    CrossRef
  3. H. Li, X. Jiao, X. Chen, Thermodynamic analysis for solubility of pimelic acid in ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. A 88, 1133-1137 (2014).
    CrossRef
  4. G. Buemi, DFT study of the hydrogen bond strength and IR spectra of formic, oxalic, glyoxylic and pyruvic acids in vacuum, acetone and water solution. Phys. Org. Chem. 22, 933–947 (2009).
    CrossRef
  5. Z. Dou, L. Wang, J. Hu, W. Fang, C. Sun, Z. Men, Hydrogen bonding effect on Raman modes of formic acid–water binary solutions. Mol. Liq. 313, 113595 (2020).
    CrossRef
  6. R.R. Pawar, S.B. Nahire, Measurement, correlation and DFT study for solubility of glutaric acid in water + ethanol binary solvents at T = (293.15 to 313.15) K. Asian J. Res. Chem. 13, 169–174 (2020).
    CrossRef
  7. R.R. Pawar, S.B. Nahire, Investigation, correlation and DFT study for solubility of malonic acid in water–methanol and water–ethanol binary solvents at T = 293.15 to 313.15 K. J. Pharm. Technol. 14, 1226–1232 (2021).
    CrossRef
  8. F. Hammami, N. Issaoui, A DFT study of the hydrogen bonded structures of pyruvic acid–water complexes. Phys. 10, 901736 (2022).
    CrossRef
  9. P. Subhapriya, K. Sadasivam, M.M. Mohan, P.S. Vijayanand, Experimental and theoretical investigation of p–n alkoxy benzoic acid based liquid crystals–A DFT approach. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 123, 511–523 (2014).
    CrossRef
  10. C. Tsioptsias, S. Matsia, A. Salifoglou, Revisiting the Thermal Behavior and Infrared Absorbance Bands of Anhydrous and Hydrated DL-Tartaric Acid, J. Mol. Sci. 26, 12029899 (2025).
    CrossRef
  11. M. Rakshan, M.S. Ismail, S. Manoj, T.A. Krithic, Mechanistic insights into dielectric relaxations of ternary liquid crystalline mixtures formed via intermolecular hydrogen bonding, Mol. Liq. 423, 132042 (2025).
    CrossRef
  12. M. Benito, G. Mahmoudi, E. Molins, E. Zangrando, Versatile copper (II) discrete and polymeric coordination compounds with (pyridine-2-yl) methylenenicotinohydrazide and azelaic acid, CrystEngComm 27, 1021 (2025).
    CrossRef
  13. M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, J.J.A. Montgomery, T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C. Burant, Gaussian 03, Revision C.02, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT (2004).
    CrossRef
  14. M.S. Raman, M. Kesavan, K. Senthilkumar, V. Ponnuswamy, Ultrasonic, DFT and FT-IR studies on hydrogen bonding interactions in aqueous solutions of diethylene glycol. Mol. Liq. 202, 115–124 (2015).
    CrossRef
  15. K. Hatua, P.K. Nandi, Relationships between different-order polarizabilities and ground state dipole moment. Theor. Comput. Chem. 12, 1250099 (2013).
    CrossRef
  16. T.Y. Lin, A. Chaudhari, S.L. Lee, Correlation between substituent constants and hyperpolarizabilities for di-substituted trans-azobenzenes. Mol. Model. 19, 529–538 (2013).
    CrossRef
  17. S.A. Blair, A.J. Thakkar, Relating polarizability to volume, ionization energy, electronegativity, hardness, moments of momentum, and other molecular properties. Chem. Phys. 141, 074306 (2014).
    CrossRef
  18. A. Masternak, G. Wenska, J. Milecki, B. Skalski, S. Franzen, Solvatochromism of a novel betaine dye derived from purine. Phys. Chem. A 109, 759–766 (2005).
    CrossRef
  19. R.S. Dumont, Effects of charging and polarization on molecular conduction via the source-sink potential method. J. Chem. 92, 100–111 (2014).
    CrossRef
  20. I.H. Jung, W.Y. Lo, J. Jang, W. Chen, D. Zhao, E.S. Landry, L. Lu, D.V. Talapin, L. Yu, Synthesis and search for design principles of new electron accepting polymers for all-polymer solar cells. Mater. 26, 3450–3459 (2014).
    CrossRef
  21. S.H. Gallagher, R.S. Armstrong, P.A. Lay, C.A. Reed, Solvent effects on the electronic spectrum of C60. Phys. Chem. 99, 5817–5825 (1995).
    CrossRef
  22. J. Wang, C. Ma, X. Ge, Z. Zhong, Q. Zhang, Thermodynamic Properties and Internal Interaction Behavior of Carboxyl-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents with 1,4-Butylactone Binary Mixtures by a Combined DFT Approach, Chem. Eng. Data 70, 698 (2025).
    CrossRef
  23. F.Y. Li, J.J. Zhao, Quantum chemistry PM3 calculations of sixteen mEGF molecules. At. Mol. Sci. 1, 68–77 (2010).
    CrossRef
  24. E. Mohammad, A. Kanaani, The effect of solvent polarity on solubility of HMX and FOX7: A DFT study. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 55, 490–496 (2017).
  25. T. Koopmans, On the assignment of wave functions and eigenvalues to the individual electrons of an atom. Physica 1, 104–113 (1934).
    CrossRef
  26. R. G. Parr, W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Oxford University Press, New York (1989).
  27. M. H. Brooker, Spectroscopic studies of aqueous carboxylic acids. J. Chem. 52, 3661–3667 (1974).
  28. G. Socrates, Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies, Wiley, 2001.
  29. L.R. Domingo, J.A. Sáez, P.M. Peiró, E. Chamorro. Solvent effect on the electrophilicity index. Org. Chem. 67 (26), 8917–8922 (2002).
  30. D.K. Mishra, C.C. Truong, Y. Jo, Recent catalytic advances in the production of adipic acid and its esters from bio-based C6 molecules and carbon dioxide, Green Chem. Eng. 2, 2457497 (2025).
    CrossRef
  31. J. Liu, L. Huang, Z. Sun, J. Li, γ-1,1-C(sp3)–H activation of aliphatic carboxylic acids: mechanistic pathways, substituent influence on product selectivity, diastereoselectivity, and additive effects, Chem. Front. 11, 1451 (2024).
    CrossRef
Article Metrics
PlumX PlumX: 
Views Views:  506 Views
PDF Downloads PDF Downloads:  279

Article Publishing History
Received on: 18 Jul 2025
Accepted on: 09 Sep 2025

Article Review Details
Reviewed by: Dr. Suresh Kumar Lakhanpal
Second Review by: Dr. Sahil Sharma
Final Approval by: Dr. YS Reddy


Share

ISSN

Print: 0973-3469, Online: 2394-0565


AUTHOR RESOURCES

Author Resources


Reviewer Resources

Reviewer Resources


Journal Blog

Journal Blog


CrossRef Member Participation


Participation Report


Partnered with Publons

Partnered with Publons


Reader Insights
Social


Special Issue – 2023


Apply for Editorial Board

Apply Online for Editorial Board Member