Next-Generation Battery Breakthroughs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Liquid, Gel, and Solid Electrolyte Advancements in Performance, Safety, and Energy Storage Potential

Introduction

The rapid advancement of energy storage technologies is driven by the escalating demand for efficient, safe, and high-capacity batteries, particularly for electric vehicles, portable electronics, and grid storage. Electrolytes, as the medium for ion transport between electrodes, play a pivotal role in determining the overall performance and safety of batteries. Traditional lithium-ion batteries have relied on liquid electrolytes, but safety concerns and performance limitations Traditional lithium-ion batteries have relied on liquid electrolytes, but safety concerns—such as flammability and leakage under stress or heat—and performance limitations, including thermal instability and the risk of dendrite-induced short circuits, have spurred the exploration of gel and solid alternatives. This review synthesizes recent progress in electrolyte materials and architectures, comparing their advantages, limitations, and future potential.^1,2

Figure 1: Ions moving freely through Liquid Electrolyte Click here to View Figure

Figure 2: Ions moving through Semi-Solid Polymer Network Click here to View Figure

Figure 3: Ions moving through Solid Electrolyte Click here to View Figure

Materials and Methods

Literature Review and Data Sources

A systematic review was conducted using 235 peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 to 2025, sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore, with search terms including “electrolyte,” “battery,” and “energy storage.” Inclusion criteria required experimental validation of ionic conductivity (>0.01 mS/cm) and cycle life exceeding 100 charge/discharge cycles. Studies were categorized by electrolyte type (liquid, gel, solid) and analyzed for performance metrics.^2,3

Comparative Analysis

Key data points such as ionic conductivity, thermal stability, cycle life, and electrode compatibility were systematically extracted from each study and tabulated for comparative analysis. To ensure consistency and transparency, performance metrics were quantitatively compared by normalizing reported values to standard conditions (e.g., ionic conductivity at 25°C, cycle life at a specified C-rate) where possible. When studies reported data under differing experimental conditions, adjustments or annotations were made to facilitate direct comparison. Recent innovations in material composition, hybrid architectures, and interface engineering were documented and cross-referenced across studies to identify trends and establish reliable benchmarks for each electrolyte type.^1,3,4

Integration of Computational and Experimental Insights

Where available, computational modeling (DFT, molecular dynamics) and advanced characterization techniques (impedance spectroscopy, calorimetry, in-situ AFM) from the literature were included to support comparative analysis and mechanistic understanding.^1,2,3

Results

Ionic Conductivity and Energy Density

Ionic Conductivity

Liquid Electrolytes

Conventional LiPF₆ in EC/DMC: 1–10 mS/cm at 25°C.^5,6

Ionic liquids (e.g., Pyr₁₄TFSI): 4–6 mS/cm at 25°C, with improved stability.^5,7

Gel Electrolytes

PVDF-HFP/SiO₂ composites: 0.1^–1 mS/cm at 25°C.^6,8

PEGDA-based gels with LiTFSI: 0.8 mS/cm at 30°C.⁸

Solid Electrolytes

LLZO (garnet): 0.7–3.4 mS/cm (temperature-dependent).^6,9

Li₆PS₅Cl (sulfide): ~10 mS/cm at 25°C.^10,11

Composite SPEs (PEO-LiTFSI/LLZTO): 0.52 × 10⁻⁴ S/cm at 25°C.⁸

Innovations

Hybrid architectures (e.g., PEO-LiTFSI with vertically aligned Li₁.₃Al₀.₃Ti₁.₇(PO₄)₃) increased conductivity by 3.6×⁸.

Ice-templated Li₁.₄Al₀.₄Ti₁.₆(PO₄)₃ (LATP) achieved 0.52 × 10⁻⁴ S/cm at RT ⁸.

Thermal Stability

Innovations

Al₂O₃-reinforced PVDF-HFP maintained stability at 200°C⁶.

LiCO₃ coatings on LLTO suppressed reactions with Li up to 350°C ⁶.

Cycle Life

Liquid Electrolytes

~500 cycles (NMC622/Li) with 80% capacity retention ¹².

Solid Electrolytes

All-solid Li-I₂ battery: 9,000 cycles at 1C, 84.1% retention ¹³.

Li₆PS₅Cl‖LiNi₀.₈Mn₀.₁Co₀.₁O₂: 1,000 cycles at 0.5C ¹¹.

Composite Electrolytes

PEO-LiTFSI/BN/Al₂O₃: 200 cycles (LiFePO₄/Li) with 95% retention ⁸.

Innovations:

In situ polymerization of PVEC-NR CPE reduced interfacial resistance, enabling stable cycling ⁸.

Li–Zn alloy interlayers suppressed dendrites, enhancing cycle life ⁸.

Electrode Compatibility

Innovations

Artificial SEI Layers

LiF-rich layers via LiPF₆ decomposition improved Li metal stability.⁷

ALD-deposited Al₂O₃ on NMC811 suppressed oxygen release.¹⁴

3D Electrode Designs: Porous Si anodes with graphene coatings reduced expansion by 40%.¹²

Material Composition Innovations

Hybrid Electrolytes

Ceramic-Polymer Composites: Li₆PS₅Cl₀.₅Br₀.₅ in polyimide matrix (thermal stability >500°C).⁶

Bio-Based Fillers: Cellulose nanofibers in PEO increased mechanical strength by 200%.¹¹

Solid-State Electrolytes

Halides (e.g., Li₃YCl₆): 1.4 mS/cm at 25°C, compatible with LiCoO₂.⁹

Sulfides (e.g., Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂): 12 mS/cm but sensitive to moisture.^10,11

Additives:

4-Fluoroethylene Carbonate (FEC): Improved SEI stability on Si anodes.⁷

LiNO₃: Suppressed polysulfide shuttle in Li-S batteries.⁷

Further innovations include the use of biodegradable gel electrolytes, such as those derived from chitosan—a polysaccharide obtained from crustacean shells—which have demonstrated high energy efficiency and complete biodegradability within months. These developments highlight the potential of bio-inspired and bio-derived materials to advance battery technology toward a more sustainable and circular future.¹⁵

Interface Engineering

Cathode Side

Li₃PO₄ coatings on NMC811 reduced interfacial resistance by 50%.¹⁴

Conformal Polymer Coatings (e.g., PEDOT:PSS) enabled stable high-voltage operation.¹⁴

Anode Side:

Li–Sn Alloys mitigated volume expansion in Si anodes.¹²

In Situ Solidification of PEGDA-based gels improved wetting.⁸

Characterization Tools

In Situ AFM mapped dendrite growth dynamics at 1 mA/cm².^6,14

XPS/ToF-SIMS revealed SEI composition evolution during cycling.^7,14

Scalability Challenges

Innovations

Spark Plasma Sintering improved LLZO density but raised costs by 30–40%⁶.

3D-Printed Electrolytes enabled customizable architectures for fast prototyping ¹².

Summary of Recent Breakthroughs

Hybrid Electrolytes: Combine ceramic fillers (e.g., LLZTO) with polymers (e.g., PVDF-HFP) for balanced ionic conductivity (0.5–1 mS/cm) and thermal stability (250–300°C).^6,811

Dendrite Suppression: SiO₂/Li–Zn alloy interlayers reduced short-circuit incidence by 60–82%.^6,8

High-Voltage Compatibility: Fluorinated additives (e.g., LiPO₂F₂) extended electrochemical windows to 5.2V ⁷.

Ultralong Cycle Life: All-solid Li-I₂ batteries achieved 9,000 cycles via confined polyiodide dissolution.¹³

Gel electrolytes (e.g., PVDF, PMMA-based): Comparable conductivity to liquids (10⁻² to 10⁻³ S/cm), improved safety and mechanical stability.^9,13

Solid electrolytes (e.g., LLZO, Li₂S): Ionic conductivity varies (10⁻⁴ to 10⁻² S/cm), with recent materials matching or exceeding liquids, and enabling higher energy densities through lithium metal compatibility.^11,13,14

Safety and Thermal Stability

Liquid electrolytes: Flammable and prone to leakage, requiring rigorous safety management ¹⁰.

Gel electrolytes: Reduced volatility, improved thermal stability, and lower risk of dendrite-induced short circuits  ^9,13.

Solid electrolytes: Non-flammable, structurally robust, and capable of operating over wide temperature ranges, significantly enhancing battery safety 13,14.

Cycle Life and Environmental Durability

Recent advancements in all-solid-state battery designs have demonstrated remarkable improvements in cycle life. For example, all-solid-state Li-I₂ batteries utilizing a confined dissolution strategy have achieved over 9,000 cycles at 1C with a capacity retention of 84.1%. This performance far exceeds that of conventional liquid and gel electrolyte systems, which typically offer cycle lives of a few hundred to a few thousand cycles before significant capacity degradation.

However, the transition to all-solid-state architectures introduces notable trade-offs. The manufacturing of solid-state batteries is considerably more complex and costly compared to traditional lithium-ion systems. Precise fabrication of solid electrolytes, stringent requirements for interfacial engineering, and the need to maintain intimate solid-solid contact throughout the battery stack all contribute to increased production challenges and higher costs. Current estimates suggest that solid-state battery manufacturing costs are significantly higher than those for conventional lithium-ion batteries, and scaling up production remains a major obstacle . Additionally, the infrastructure for large-scale manufacturing of solid-state batteries is less mature, further complicating their commercialization.

While the long cycle life and enhanced safety of all-solid-state Li-I₂ batteries are clear advantages, these benefits must be weighed against the increased production complexity and cost. Ongoing research is focused on reducing manufacturing costs, improving scalability, and developing hybrid or composite solutions that balance performance with practical manufacturability.^11,14

Compatibility with Electrodes

Electrode Compatibility

The compatibility between electrolytes and electrodes remains a critical challenge in next-generation batteries. At the cathode/electrolyte interface, high-voltage instability often leads to oxidative degradation and increased interfacial resistance, particularly when operating above 4.3 V. Additives such as LiPO₂F₂ have been shown to widen the electrochemical window, enabling stable cycling at potentials up to 5.2 V.On the anode side, lithium dendrite growth and volume expansion—especially in silicon or lithium metal anodes—can cause mechanical stress, internal short circuits, and rapid capacity fade. The incorporation of fillers such as boron nitride (BN) or aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) into gel or solid polymer electrolytes has been effective in reducing dendrite formation by up to 60%.

Recent advances in interfacial characterization have provided deeper insights into these phenomena. In situ and operando atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques, for example, allow direct observation of SEI layer evolution, dendrite nucleation, and mechanical deformation at the electrode/electrolyte interface during cycling. These advanced imaging methods have revealed the dynamic nature of interfacial processes and enabled the development of more robust artificial SEI layers and interlayer designs.Additionally, other characterization tools such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) have been instrumental in analyzing the chemical composition and evolution of interfacial layers.

By integrating these insights, researchers are better equipped to engineer interfaces that enhance compatibility, suppress dendrite growth, and improve cycle life in next-generation battery systems.^{9,10,11,12,13}

Scalability and Manufacturing

Scaling up the synthesis and processing of advanced electrolytes, especially solid-state systems, remains challenging.^13,14

Hybrid and composite approaches are being explored to balance performance, manufacturability, and cost.^6,11

Comparative Summary of Liquid, Gel, and Solid Electrolytes: Advantages and Limitations

Discussion

Comparative Advantages and Limitations

Each electrolyte type presents a unique set of trade-offs:

Liquids offer high conductivity and established manufacturing but are limited by safety risks ¹⁰.

Gels provide a balance between conductivity and safety, with flexibility for new form factors ^9,13.

Solids promise the highest safety and energy density, but face challenges in interfacial resistance and large-scale production.^11,13,14

Interface Engineering and Hybrid Systems

Recent research emphasizes the importance of interface engineering-using coatings, interlayers, and composite architectures-to overcome interfacial resistance and compatibility issues in solid-state batteries. Hybrid electrolytes that combine ceramics and polymers are emerging as a promising route to balance ionic conductivity, flexibility, and processability.^9,11,13

Safety and Durability

The shift toward non-flammable, robust electrolytes is critical for applications in electric vehicles and grid storage. Both gel and solid electrolytes show significant improvements in thermal stability and dendrite suppression, directly addressing key safety concerns.^9,11,13

Future Research Directions

Scalability: Developing cost-effective, scalable synthesis methods for advanced electrolytes^.13,14

Sustainability: Prioritizing environmentally friendly, recyclable materials.¹¹

Performance: Further reducing interfacial resistance, enhancing compatibility with high-capacity electrodes, and improving cycle life.^9,10,11,13

Hybrid and Bio-inspired Materials: Exploring nanostructured, hybrid, and bio-inspired electrolyte systems for next-generation batteries.^9,11

Table 1: Comparative overview of liquid, gel, and solid electrolytes for next-generation batteries

Outlook: The Role of Machine Learning and AI in Electrolyte Discovery and Optimization

Recent years have seen the rapid integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) into the discovery and optimization of battery electrolytes. These data-driven approaches are transforming the traditionally slow and trial-and-error process of electrolyte development by enabling high-throughput screening of vast chemical spaces and the prediction of key performance metrics such as ionic conductivity, thermal stability, and electrochemical compatibility.^16,17

ML models trained on large experimental and computational datasets can accurately predict the properties of both liquid and solid electrolytes, including the effects of salt, solvent, and additive composition¹⁷. For example, chemistry-informed neural networks have been developed to predict the ionic conductivity of polymer electrolytes, significantly accelerating the identification of promising candidates beyond the reach of conventional experimental methods. Similarly, AI-assisted simulations and experimental validation have elucidated the atomic-scale mechanisms underlying ion transport in aqueous and solid-state electrolytes, leading to improved electrolyte formulations for next-generation batteries.^18-24.

Advanced AI frameworks now balance multiple, often conflicting, performance criteria—such as ionic conductivity, stability, and Coulombic efficiency—to identify optimal electrolyte compositions and guide experimental synthesis. Integration of AI with microscopy and spectroscopy techniques further enables real-time analysis of electrolyte interfaces and degradation mechanisms, providing unprecedented insights into battery performance and durability.

Looking ahead, the continued development of ML and AI tools is expected to further accelerate the discovery of novel electrolyte materials, optimize hybrid and composite systems, and facilitate the transition toward sustainable, high-performance energy storage solutions. The synergy between data-driven science and experimental validation will be essential for overcoming current bottlenecks in electrolyte design and for realizing the full potential of next-generation batteries.

Conclusion

Advances in liquid, gel, and solid electrolytes are reshaping next-generation battery technology. Each electrolyte type offers distinct advantages and faces unique challenges in terms of stability, cost, charging/discharging speed (ionic conductivity in mS/cm), safety, and cycle life—key factors for electric vehicle (EV) batteries.

Liquid electrolytes

Remain the current industry standard for EVs because of their low cost (~$120/kWh), high ionic conductivity (1–10 mS/cm, enabling fast charging/discharging), and scalable manufacturing, though they have safety concerns (flammability) and moderate cycle life (~500 cycles).

Gel electrolytes 

Offer improved safety and stability over liquids, with decent ionic conductivity (0.1–1 mS/cm), moderate cost (~$150/kWh), and reduced volatility, though they still lag behind liquids and solids in long-term performance.

Solid electrolytes 

Demonstrate the highest potential for the future of EV batteries, providing unmatched safety (non-flammable, stable up to 300–500°C), the longest cycle life (>1,000–9,000 cycles), and continually improving ionic conductivity (up to 12 mS/cm with new materials). However, high cost (>$300/kWh) and manufacturing challenges currently limit large-scale adoption.

The convergence of materials science, electrochemistry, and engineering is expected to overcome these challenges—delivering safer, higher-performing, and more sustainable energy storage solutions. Solid electrolytes represent the most promising direction for next-generation EV batteries, provided cost and scalability can be addressed, while liquid electrolytes remain optimal for today’s commercial vehicles.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Physics and Electronics, Pithapur Rajah’s Government College (Autonomous), Kakinada-a research center affiliated with Adikavi Nannaya University, Rajamahendravaram-for providing access to laboratory facilities, instrumentation, and computational resources essential for the preparation of this review. Special thanks are extended to the technical staff and colleagues for their support in literature retrieval, data organization, and manuscript preparation. The collaborative and resource-rich environment of the institution was invaluable to the comprehensive analysis and synthesis presented in this work.

Funding Sources

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) do not have any conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this review article as no new datasets were generated or analyzed. All data discussed are derived from previously published sources, which are appropriately cited throughout the manuscript.

Ethics Statement

This review article did not involve human participants, animal subjects, or the use of any materials requiring ethical approval. All data and analyses presented are based solely on previously published literature, and therefore, no ethical approval was necessary for the preparation of this manuscript.

Informed Consent Statement

This review article did not involve human participants, and therefore, informed consent was not required for its preparation

Permission to Reproduce Material from Other Sources

Not applicable. This review article does not include any material requiring permission for reproduction from other sources.

Author Contributions

• Somarouthu Venkata Govardhana Veera Anjaneya Prasad: Conceptualized the review, coordinated the overall structure and direction, conducted extensive literature survey, drafted and revised the manuscript.
• Yarra Ramu: Participated in gathering and synthesizing literature data, contributed to comparative analysis of battery technologies and helped structure the review content.
• Kotana Kusuma: Assisted in literature collection, data extraction, and helped with drafting and editing specific sections of the review.
• Teki Naga Bhavani: Contributed to critical discussion and interpretation of literature findings, revised the manuscript for intellectual content, and supported final editing.

References

1. Subhani T, Khademolqorani S, Banitaba SN, Ramadan M, Khaliq A, Chaudhry IA, Osman AI. Advancements in battery materials: bio-based and mineral fillers for next-generation solid polymer electrolytes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.2024;16(46):63089–63108. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c11214
   CrossRef
2. Cui G, Tominaga Y. Polymer electrolytes toward next-generation batteries. Macromol Chem Phys.2022;223(8):2200013. doi:10.1002/macp.202200013
   CrossRef
3. Itani K, De Bernardinis A. Review on new-generation batteries technologies: trends and future directions. 2023;16(22):7530. doi:10.3390/en16227530
   CrossRef
4. Chen A, Qu C, Shi Y, Shi F. Manufacturing strategies for solid electrolyte in batteries. Front Energy Res.2020;8:571440. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.571440
   CrossRef
5. Rana S, Thakur RC, Dosanjh HS. Ionic liquids as battery electrolytes for lithium ion batteries: recent advances and future prospects. Solid State Ionics.2023;400:116340. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116340
   CrossRef
6. Wu CW, Ren X, Zhou WX, Xie G, Zhang G. Thermal stability and thermal conductivity of solid electrolytes. APL Mater.2022;10(4):040902. doi:10.1063/5.0089891
   CrossRef
7. Lei Y, Wang K, Jiang S, Xu X, Zheng J, Yin J, Gao Y. Recent progress on multifunctional electrolyte additives for high-energy-density Li batteries – a review. 2024;11(8):e20230070. doi:10.1002/celc.20230070
   CrossRef
8. Wang S, La Monaca A, Demopoulos GP. Composite solid-state electrolytes for all solid-state lithium batteries: progress, challenges and outlook. Energy Adv.2025;4:11–36. doi:10.1039/D4YA00542B
   CrossRef
9. Thangadurai V, Chen B. Solid Li- and Na-ion electrolytes for next generation rechargeable batteries. Chem Mater.2022;34(15):6637–6658. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01475
   CrossRef
10. Tian Y, Shi T, Richards WD, et al. Compatibility issues between electrodes and electrolytes in solid-state batteries. Energy Environ Sci.2017;10(5):1150–1166. doi:10.1039/C7EE00534B
    CrossRef
11. Chang H, Zhang X, Li W, et al. Recent developments in composite solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries and their applications in deep-sea environment. Next Mater.2025;6:100307. doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100307
    CrossRef
12. Ang EH, Meng YS, Murugesan V. New materials and design are needed to overcome current battery limitations and enable faster charging, longer life and greater efficiency. Technology Networks.Published May 13, 2025. Accessed May 15, 2025. https://www.technologynetworks.com/ applied-sciences/articles/new-materials-and-design-revolutionize-battery-science-for-faster-charging-and-longer-cycle-life-398565
13. Cheng Z, Pan H, Li F, et al. Achieving long cycle life for all-solid-state rechargeable Li-I₂ battery by a confined dissolution strategy. Nat Commun.2022;13(1):125. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27728-0
    CrossRef
14. Du M, Liao K, Lu Q, Shao Z. Recent advances in the interface engineering of solid-state Li-ion batteries with artificial buffer layers: challenges, materials, construction, and characterization. Energy Environ Sci.2019;12(6):1780–1804. doi:10.1039/C9EE00515C
    CrossRef
15. Meiling Wu, Ye Zhang, Lin Xu, Chunpeng Yang, Min Hong, Mingjin Cui, Bryson C. Clifford, Shuaiming He, Shuangshuang Jing, Yan Yao, Liangbing Hu. A sustainable chitosan-zinc electrolyte for high-rate zinc-metal batteries. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.matt.2022.07.015
    CrossRef
16. Merchant A, Batzner S, Schoenholz SS, et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. 2023;624:80–85. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9
    CrossRef
17. Chattopadhyay, J., Pathak, T. S., & Santos, D. M. F. (2023). Applications of polymer electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries: A review. Polymers, 15(19), 3907. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15193907.
    CrossRef
18. Ritesh Kumar, et al. Electrolytomics: a unified big data approach for electrolyte design and discovery. Chem Mater. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c03196
    CrossRef
19. BNL Newsroom. Scientists use AI and X-ray vision to gain insight into battery electrolyte. BNL Newsroom, Media & Communications Office, DOE Office of Science.Accessed June 13, 2025. https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/
20. Journal of Energy Storage. (2025). Next-generation electrolytes for advanced battery systems: Materials, properties, and applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 130, 117314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.117314
    CrossRef
21. Wang, S., La Monaca, A., & Demopoulos, G. P. (2025). Composite solid-state electrolytes for all solid-state lithium batteries: progress, challenges and outlook. Energy Advances, 4, 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4YA00542B
    CrossRef
22. Yan, Y., Hai, F., Wang, B., Cao, W., Li, M., Wang, C., Li, N., & Zhao, D. (2025). Machine learning accelerates high-voltage electrolyte discovery for lithium metal batteries. Energy Storage Materials, 79, 104312.
    CrossRef
23. Jeong, D., Tackett, B. M., & Pol, V. G. (2025). Tailored Li-ion battery electrodes and electrolytes for extreme condition operations. Communications Chemistry, 8, Article 170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-025-01117-3
    CrossRef
24. Hou, T., Wang, D., Jiang, B., Liu, Y., Kong, J., He, Y., Huang, Y., & Xu, H. (2025). Ion bridging enables high-voltage polyether electrolytes for quasi-solid-state batteries. Nature Communications, 16, Article 962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-00962-4
    CrossRef

Abbreviations List

LIB: Lithium-ion battery

LMO: Lithium manganese oxide (LiMn₂O₄)

LLZTO: Lithium lanthanum zirconium tantalum oxide

LATP: Lithium aluminum titanium phosphate (Li₁.₃Al₀.₃Ti₁.₇(PO₄)₃)

SEI: Solid electrolyte interphase/interface

NMC: Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide

LCO    : Lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO₂)

LLZO : Lithium lanthanum zirconate (Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂)

LLTO : Lithium lanthanum titanium oxide                    

LTO : Lithium titanium oxide (Li₂TiO₃)

LiPF₆: Lithium hexafluorophosphate

LiTFSI :Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide

EC : Ethylene carbonate

DMC :   Dimethyl carbonate                      

PEGDA :Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate

PVDF-HFP :Poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)

GPE  :Gel polymer electrolyte

SPE: Solid polymer electrolyte

AFM :Atomic force microscopy

XPS: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

CPE :Composite polymer electrolyte

ToF-SIMS :Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry

LiNO₃ : Lithium nitrate

PVEC-NR: Poly(vinylethylene carbonate)-natural rubber

Al₂O₃  : Aluminum oxide

Li₂S   : Lithium sulfide

Li₃YCl₆: Lithium yttrium chloride

PEDOT:PSS: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate)

DFT: Density functional theory

mS/cm : Millisiemens per centimeter (unit of ionic conductivity)

C-rate (1C, 0.5C, etc.) : Charge/discharge rate relative to battery capacity

Li₁₀GeP₂S₁₂: Lithium germanium phosphorous sulfide

SiO₂: Silicon dioxide

BN: Boron nitride

Li₆PS₅Cl: Lithium argyrodite (sulfide solid electrolyte)

ALD : Atomic layer deposition

FEC : Fluoroethylene carbonate