Views 
   PDF Download PDF Downloads: 760

 Open Access -   Download full article: 

Structural and Low Temperature Electrical Properties of A Nickel/Iron Multilayer

P. J. Sadashivaiah1, T. Sujatha2, T. Sankarappa1*, Santosh Kumar1 and A. K. Bhatnagar3

1Department of Physics, Gulbarga University, Gulbarga - 585 106, India. 

2H.P.S. Kalkhora, Basavakalyan (Tq), Bidar (Dt), India. 

3School of Physics, Hyderabad University, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India.

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/msri/080217

Article Publishing History
Article Received on : 10 Aug 2011
Article Accepted on : 17 Sep 2011
Article Published :
Plagiarism Check: No
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

A multilayer, [Ni(100nm)/Fe(100nm)]5 has been deposited by electron beam evaporation method under high vacuum at 473 K. The structure and grain size were investigated by the grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) studies. The surface roughness was determined by atomic force microscope (AFM). Electrical resistivity has been measured in the temperature range from 4.2K to 300 K. The resistivity increased with increase in temperature. The residual resistivity ratio (RRR) and the temperature coefficient of resistivity (TCR) were determined. The power law variations of resistivity with temperature were established. For temperature, T, above 80K, the resistivity exponent was found to be slightly more than unity and it was nearly 5 for temperature below 30K. The contributions to resistivity for T above 80K are attributed to be predominant by electron-phonon and electron-magnon scatterings and for below 30K they are ascribed to be predominant by electron-electron and electron-defect scattering.

KEYWORDS: Multilayers; Surface roughness; Resistivity; Residual resistivity ratio (RRR)

Copy the following to cite this article:

Sadashivaiah P. J, Sujatha T, Sankarappa T, Santoshkumar, Bhatnagar A. K. Structural and Low Temperature Electrical Properties of A Nickel/Iron Multilayer. Mat.Sci.Res.India;8(2)


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Sadashivaiah P. J, Sujatha T, Sankarappa T, Santoshkumar, Bhatnagar A. K. Structural and Low Temperature Electrical Properties of A Nickel/Iron Multilayer. Mat.Sci.Res.India;8(2). Available from: http://www.materialsciencejournal.org/?p=2665


Introduction

In the recent past the structural and electrical studies of magnetic multilayers have been intensely pursued.1 For example, [Ni(86Å)/ Fe(29Å)]11 multilayer was probed for texture and magnetic properties as a function of deposition temperature.2 An irradiated multilayer, [Ni(13Å/ Fe(33Å)]10 with swift heavy ions was studied for magneto-optic Kerr effect and electrical resistivity as a function of temperature.3 The interface mixing leading to alloy phase formation was observed when the films were irradiated. Similar studies were reported for Si+ ion irradiated Fe(28Å)/Ni(85Å) multilayers. Power laws for the resistivity variation with temperature were established. Experimental results on resistivity and magnetization in Ni-Fe alloy films are reported.4 The Ni/Fe bilayers are technologically very important because of their low resistivity. From this brief literature survey, it can be understood that the detailed studies of structure and electrical properties have not been reported for Nickel/Iron multilayers. In view of this, we studied structural and electrical properties of a multilayer, [Ni/Fe]5.

Experimental

The multilayer, [Ni(100nm)/Fe(100nm)]5 has been deposited on to a clean glass substrate at 473K and a pressure of 5 x 10-6 mbar. The substrate has been cleaned by following the procedure mentioned in ref.5 The Ni and Fe layers were deposited by evaporating the nickel and iron sources from two separate molybdenum crucibles using two independent electron beam guns. The thickness of the layers was measured with the help of quartz crystal thickness monitor. The films were annealed to room temperature slowly in the vacuum chamber.

Structural investigations were carried out by grazing incidence X- ray diffraction (GIXRD) studies using Brucker-D8 advance diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation of 1.5406 Å wavelength. Surface morphology of the films was investigated by AFM (Digital Instruments Nanoscope III). Average grain size and surface roughness of the films were determined on a scan area of 1µm × 1µm using Nanoscope software. The low temperature (4.2K to 300K) resistivity, ρ has been measured by adopting four probe method using an Oxford Instruments make resistivity setup.

Results and Discussion

Grazing Incidence X-Ray Diffraction (GIXRD) Studies

The GIXRD spectra for 2θ between 420 and 480 for the present film is shown in Fig.1(a) and the Gaussian fit to the peak is depicted in Fig.1(b). The spectra exhibited single sharp peak and its position does not exactly represent any plane in Fe or Ni crystals and therefore it can be considered to be representing a mixed phase (Ni(111)/Fe(110)) of Fe and Ni. No other peaks are visible in the spectrum up to 600. The average grain sizes have been estimated using Scherrer’s formula [6], = (0.9λ/BcosθB)where, D is the grain size, B the angular width in terms of 2θ, θB the Bragg angle and λ the wavelength of X-rays. The interplanar spacing, d was calculated using the relation, d  = ( λ / 2 sinθB).

The structure around the peak has been analyzed. The grain size and inter-planar spacing were determined to be 24.60 nm and 2.019 Å respectively.

Figure 1: (a) GIXRD spectra for the film and (b) spectra around the peak position. The solid line in fig(b) is a Gaussian fit to the peak

Figure 1
Click on image to enlarge

AFM Studies

The surface morphology has been understood through AFM images which were recorded in contact mode with a scan area of 1ìm x 1ìm. The 2D and 3D AFM images of the film are shown in Fig. 2. The AFM image have been quantified by recording the height versus distance profile across the length (white line drawn in Fig. 2(a)) as shown in Fig.3 [7]. This analysis provided information about average grain size (D) (pair of blue dot lines in Fig.3) to be 118 nm and average surface roughness (h) (pair of red and green dot lines in Fig.3) to be 2.983 [8]. The grains appeared to be cubic in shape.

It can be noted that D value obtained from AFM studies is larger than that obtained from GIXRD. The disagreement between the grain sizes measured by two different methods could be due to the fact the measurements on AMF images are based on visual inspection. In case of GIXRD, it is to do with microscopic scattering of X-rays with lattice points/planes. This further reveals that the grains observed in AFM images are the agglomerates of many small crystallites that were seen by XRD. Such small crystallites in the images can be observed by High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM).9

Figure 2: AFM images of the film (a) 2D (b) 3D

figure 2
Click on image to enlarge

Figure 3: Height, h versus Distance, D profile across the length white line drawn in Fig.2(a).

figure 3
Click on image to enlarge

Resistivity Behaviour with Temperature

The measured ρ as a function of temperature, T is shown in Fig.4. The ρ increased with increasing temperatures. The ρ varied between 0.612 µΩm and 1.027 µΩm for the temperature range from 5K to 300K. The room temperature (300K) ρ is greater by one to two orders of magnitude than the bulk ρ value of the two components (Ni ~ 0.072 µΩm and Fe ~ 0.09 µΩm). The larger ρ measured in this film may be due to intermixing of layers at the interface10 and this was also evident from GIXRD results.

Figure 4: Resistivity, ρ versus temperature, T plot for film for the complete temperature range

figure 4
Click on image to enlarge

The temperature coefficient of resistivity, TCR = (dρ/dT)/ρRT is determined to be 1.670 x 10-3 K-1. It may be noted that TCR has been determined for the temperature range from 80K to 300K, where ρ varied linearly with T. The positive TCR points to the metallic behavior of the film. The residual resistivity ratio, RRR is 1.67 and it is smaller than that expected for pure bulk metals. The small RRR value observed in this films may be due to enhanced electron-electron, interfacial, grain boundary etc., scatterings.5,11

A close observation variation of ρ with T revealed that there exist three different power laws for the measured temperature range. Hence, the following expressions were fit to the data,

ρ (T ) = ρ(0) + a1T k for T ≤ 30K

ρ (T ) = ρ(0) + a 2T m  for 30K ≤ T≤ 80K

ρ (T ) = ρ(0) + a3T n  for 80K ≤ T ≤ 300K

where, ρ (0) is the residual resistivity which is taken to be equal to the measured value at 5K in all the films. By non linear curve fitting, the coefficients , a2 and a3 and exponents k, m and n were determined. The fit parameters thus obtained are = 0.911 µΩ m K-k, = 1.514 µΩm K-m, = 5.483 µΩm K-n, k = 4.76, m = 2.84 and n = 1.18. The data and the fit curves for the temperature range T ≤ 30K, 30K ≤ T ≤ 80K and 80K ≤ T ≤ 300K are shown in Fig.5(a-c).

Figure 5: Resistivity, ρ versus temperature,T plots of (a) 5K to 30K, (b) 30K to 80K and (c) 80K to 300K for the film. The continuous curves passing through the data points are fits to the data

Figure 5
Click on image to enlarge

For pure nonmagnetic metals, the resistivity varies linearly with temperature (high temperature). For the present film, in the temperature range, 80K ≤ T ≤ 300K the coefficient, n is obtained to be slightly more than unity which reveals the predominance of electron-phonon scattering. In Fe/Ni multilayer, the resistivity was found to vary as T1.44 for the temperature range from 80K to 300K and this was attributed to additional electron-magnon (s-d) scattering, where s electrons were expected to scatter by magnons in to d band holes [3]. In the temperature range, 30K ≤ T ≤ 80K, the exponent, m is found to be 2.84 and that agrees with a magnetic layer [3] and deviates from White and Woods value of 3.3 for bulk Fe [13]. For the temperature, T ≤ 30K, the exponent, k is found to be 4.76. This result points out that in this range of temperature major contributions are from electron-electron and electron-defects (which includes impurity) scatterings.

Conclusions

A Multilayer [Ni(100nm)/Fe(100nm)]5 has been investigated for structure, grain size and surface roughness through GIXRD and AFM.

Electrical resistivity as a function of temperature in the range from 4.2K to 300K has been measured. The residual resistance ratio (RRR) and the temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) were determined. Resistivity increased with increasing temperature. The power laws for the resistivity variation with temperature were established. The power law exponent was slightly more than unity in the temperature region 80K≤ T≤300K and about 5 in the low temperature region T≤30K. It is concluded that in this film, electron-electron and electron-defect scatterings are predominant below 30K and, electron-phonon and electron-magnon scatterings are predominant above 80K.

Acknowledgements

Authors also grateful acknowledge the experimental help received from Dr.R.Rawat, Scientist and Prof. Ajaya Gupta, Director of UGC-DAE consortium for Scientific Research, Indore, India.

References

  1. B. Heinrich, S.T. Purcell, J.R. Dutcher, K.B. Urquhart, J.F. Cochran and A.S. Arrott, Phys.Rev. B 38: 12 879 (1988).
  2. T. Veres, M. Cai, R. Morel, R. W. Cochrane, R. Abdouche and M. Sutton, J. Appl. Phys.,81: 4758 (1997).
    CrossRef
  3. S. K. Srivastava, Ravikumar, A. Gupta, R. S. Patel, A.K. Majumdar, D. K.Avasthi, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B 243: 304 (2004).
    CrossRef
  4. Y.C. Yeh , C.W. Huang and J.T. Lue, Applied Surface Science, 254: 3420 (2008).
    CrossRef
  5. P.J.Sadashivaiah, T.Sankarappa, T.Sujatha, Santoshkumar, R.Rawat, P.Saravanan andA.K.Bhatnagar, Vacuum, 85: 466 (2010).
    CrossRef
  6. B.D.Cullity: Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley Inc., Massachusetts, USA,1956)
  7. D. K. Aswal, K. P. Muthe, Shilpa Tawde, Sipra Chodhury, N. Bagkar, Ajay Singh, S. K. Gupta and J. V. Lakhmi, Journal of Crystal Growth, 236: 661 (2002).
    CrossRef
  8. B. Sasi and K. G. Gopchandran,Nanotechnology, 18: 115613 (2007).
    CrossRef
  9. J. B. Yi, Y. Z. Zhou, J. Ding, G. M. Chow, Z. L.Dong, T. White, Xing Yu Gao, A. T. S. Wee and X. J. Yu, J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 284: 303 (2004).
    CrossRef
  10. R. Brajpuriya, S. Tripathi, S. M. Chaudhari, Solid State Communication, 134: 479 (2005).
    CrossRef
  11. M. N. Ou, T. J. Yang, S. R. Harutyunyan, Y. Y.Chen, C. D. Chen, S. J. Lai, Appl. Phys. Letts.92: 063101 (2008)
    CrossRef
  12. G.R. Taylor, A. Isin, R.E. Coleman, Phys.Rev. 165: 621 (1968).
    CrossRef
  13. G.K. White, S.B. Wood, Philos. Trans. RoyalSoc. London A 251: 273 (1958).
Share Button

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.